Download from app store
We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.
Sign in
Join now
Gail Hecht MD
Gail Hecht MD Editor-in-Chief
Scott Cotler MD
Scott J. Cotler MD Associate Editor
Steven Edmundowicz MD, MASGE
Steven A. Edmundowicz MD, MASGE Associate Editor
See All Experts
featured
Published in Gastroenterology

Expert Opinion / My Approach · April 14, 2015

MY APPROACH to Endoscopic Techniques to Improve the Adenoma Detection Rate

Joseph Feuerstein MD
Mandeep Sawhney MD, MS, FASGE

 

 Save  Recommend
 Share

Additional Info

  1. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):72-90.
  2. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the us multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(6):1296-1308.
  3. Kahi CJ, Vemulapalli KC, Johnson CS, Rex DK. Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(3):448-454.
  4. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1298-1306.
  5. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(6):1197-1203.
  6. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(6):1207-1214.
  7. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(3):620-625.
  8. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(2):89-95.
  9. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(2):452-456.
  10. Hewett DG, Rex DK. Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(2):246-252.
  11. Kushnir VM, Oh YS, Hollander T, et al. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(3):415-422.
  12. Aslanian HR, Shieh FK, Chan FW, et al. Nurse observation during colonoscopy increases polyp detection: a randomized prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(2):166-172.
  13. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(24):2533-2541.
  14. Butterly L, Robinson CM, Anderson JC, et al. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(3):417-426.
  15. Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N, et al. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time ≥ 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(6):1892-1898.
  16. Rex DK, Hewett DG, Raghavendra M, Chalasani N. The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(11):2312-2317.
  17. Kahi CJ, Ballard D, Shah AS, et al. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(6):925-931.
  18. Gralnek IM, Siersema PD, Halpern Z, et al. Standard Forward-Viewing Colonoscopy Versus Full-Spectrum Endoscopy: An International, Multicentre, Randomised, Tandem Colonoscopy Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):353-360.

  19. Rubin M, Bose KP, Kim SH. Mo1517 successful deployment and use of Third Eye Panoramic™ a novel side viewing video cap fitted on a standard colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(5):AB466.

  20. DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF, et al. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: The Third Eye Retroscope Study Group. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(3):542-550.
  21. Biecker E, Floer M, Heinecke A, et al. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial [published online June 20, 2014]. J Clin Gastroenterol. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000166.
  22. Hasan N, Gross SA, Gralnek IM, et al. A novel balloon colonoscope detects significantly more simulated polyps than a standard colonoscope in a colon model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(6):1135-1140.

Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:

Mandeep Sawhney MD, MS, FASGE

Further Reading

Most Read This Week

Recently Updated