Download from app store
We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.
All content curated by
Available until 10/1/2024

Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying access to a selection of our top-read and most recent articles. Please register today for a free account and gain full access to all of our expert-selected content.

Already Have An Account? Log in Now

featured
Published in Eye Care

Journal Scan / Research · August 19, 2024

Performance of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests in Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual Field Defects

American Journal of Ophthalmology

 

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

abstract

This abstract is available on the publisher's site.

Access this abstract now   Full Text Available for ClinicalKey Subscribers

Additional Info

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma with Central Visual field Defects
Am J Ophthalmol 2024 Jul 31;[EPub Ahead of Print], E Nishijima, K Fukai, K Sano, T Noro, S Ogawa, S Okude, M Tatemichi, GC Lee, A Iwase, T Nakano

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Further Reading