Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying temporary access to this content.
Please register today for a free account and gain full access
to all of our expert-selected content.
Already Have An Account? Log in Now
Oral Antibiotic Use and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the UK
abstract
This abstract is available on the publisher's site.
Access this abstract nowBACKGROUND
Microbiome dysbiosis predisposes to colorectal cancer (CRC), but a population-based study of oral antibiotic exposure and risk patterns is lacking.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the association between oral antibiotic use and CRC risk.
DESIGN
A matched case-control study (incident CRC cases and up to five matched controls) was performed using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from 1989 to 2012.
RESULTS
28 980 CRC cases and 137 077 controls were identified. Oral antibiotic use was associated with CRC risk, but effects differed by anatomical location. Antibiotic use increased the risk of colon cancer in a dose-dependent fashion (ptrend <0.001). The risk was observed after minimal use, and was greatest in the proximal colon and with antibiotics with anti-anaerobic activity. In contrast, an inverse association was detected between antibiotic use and rectal cancers (ptrend=0.003), particularly with length of antibiotic exposure >60 days (adjusted OR (aOR), 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.93) as compared with no antibiotic exposure. Penicillins, particularly ampicillin/amoxicillin increased the risk of colon cancer (aOR=1.09 (1.05 to 1.13)), whereas tetracyclines reduced the risk of rectal cancer (aOR=0.90 (0.84 to 0.97)). Significant interactions were detected between antibiotic use and tumour location (colon vs rectum, pinteraction<0.001; proximal colon versus distal colon, pinteraction=0.019). The antibiotic-cancer association was found for antibiotic exposure occurring >10 years before diagnosis (aOR=1.17 (1.06 to 1.31)).
CONCLUSION
Oral antibiotic use is associated with an increased risk of colon cancer but a reduced risk of rectal cancer. This effect heterogeneity may suggest differences in gut microbiota and carcinogenesis mechanisms along the lower intestinal tract.
Additional Info
Oral Antibiotic Use and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the United Kingdom, 1989–2012: A Matched Case–Control Study
Gut 2019 Aug 19;[EPub Ahead of Print], J Zhang, C Haines, AJM Watson, AR Hart, MJ Platt, DM Pardoll, SE Cosgrove, KA Gebo, CL SearsFrom MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
Colorectal cancer incidence in the US, and quite similarly in other western societies, has experienced rapid changes over the last few decades. Thus, a steady increase until the mid-1980s was followed by a constant decline afterwards, only explained in part by the progressive generalization of colorectal cancer screening. A more recent trend has been a notable surge in incidence among younger individuals, which has averaged a 1.8% annual increase from 2006 to 2015 among those younger than 55 years of age. These rapid changes can only be explained by evolving environmental exposures and lifestyle factors. Among those, the last century has seen the development and subsequent generalization of the use of antibiotics. The use of these has been clearly linked with a disruption in gut microbiota, and this disruption has been associated with several gastrointestinal diseases such as colorectal cancer. In fact, several studies have suggested a direct relationship between antibiotic use and colorectal cancer development.
In this context, Zhang et al aimed to determine the effects of different families of antibiotics on colorectal cancer incidence by location. In order to do so, the authors used the rich, population-based, prospective database from the British Clinical Practice Research Datalink, which includes 14 million patients with antibiotic prescription data and variables such as BMI, alcohol and tobacco consumption, and comorbidities. The results showed a complex picture with a dose-dependent increased risk of colon cancer, particularly in the proximal colon, among antibiotic users. The greatest association was seen in individuals who took anti-anaerobic antibiotics. On the other hand, the effect was the opposite for rectal cancers, with the most significant reduction in risk among individuals who took tetracyclines. Understanding the mechanisms of these effects and how we can leverage those to tackle this cancer is a new challenge we face now.