Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying temporary access to this content.
Please register today for a free account and gain full access
to all of our expert-selected content.
Already Have An Account? Log in Now
Neurologic Syndromes Related to Anti-GAD65
abstract
This abstract is available on the publisher's site.
Access this abstract nowOBJECTIVE
Antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (anti-GAD65) are associated with a number of neurologic syndromes. However, their pathogenic role is controversial. Our objective was to describe clinical and paraclinical characteristics of anti-GAD65 patients and analyze their response to immunotherapy.
METHODS
Retrospectively, we studied patients (n = 56) with positive anti-GAD65 and any neurologic symptom. We tested serum and CSF with ELISA, immunohistochemistry, and cell-based assay. Accordingly, we set a cutoff value of 10,000 IU/mL in serum by ELISA to group patients into high-concentration (n = 36) and low-concentration (n = 20) groups. We compared clinical and immunologic features and analyzed response to immunotherapy.
RESULTS
Classical anti-GAD65-associated syndromes were seen in 34/36 patients with high concentration (94%): stiff-person syndrome (7), cerebellar ataxia (3), chronic epilepsy (9), limbic encephalitis (9), or an overlap of 2 or more of the former (6). Patients with low concentrations had a broad, heterogeneous symptom spectrum. Immunotherapy was effective in 19/27 treated patients (70%), although none of them completely recovered. Antibody concentration reduction occurred in 15/17 patients with available pre- and post-treatment samples (median reduction 69%; range 27%-99%), of which 14 improved clinically. The 2 patients with unchanged concentrations showed no clinical improvement. No differences in treatment responses were observed between specific syndromes.
CONCLUSION
Most patients with high anti-GAD65 concentrations (>10,000 IU/mL) showed some improvement after immunotherapy, unfortunately without complete recovery. Serum antibody concentrations' course might be useful to monitor response. In patients with low anti-GAD65 concentrations, especially in those without typical clinical phenotypes, diagnostic alternatives are more likely.
Additional Info
Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:
Neurologic Syndromes Related to Anti-GAD65: Clinical and Serologic Response to Treatment
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2020 May 01;7(3)e696, A Muñoz-Lopetegi, MAAM de Bruijn, S Boukhrissi, AEM Bastiaansen, MMP Nagtzaam, ESP Hulsenboom, AJW Boon, RF Neuteboom, JM de Vries, PAE Sillevis Smitt, MWJ Schreurs, MJ TitulaerFrom MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
Antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), the enzyme catalyzing the conversion of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate to inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), can impair GABAergic neurotransmission, resulting in neuronal excitability disorders, with most characteristic the stiff person syndrome (SPS). However, GAD antibodies also are associated with other neurological diseases comprising the “GAD antibody–spectrum disorders (GAD-SD)” that include refractory autoimmune epilepsy (AE), limbic encephalitis (LE), cerebellar ataxia CA), and nystagmus. Because GAD is expressed on β-pancreatic cells, low-titer GAD-Abs are also detected in DM1 diabetes. Although the pathogenicity of GAD-Abs is unclear, it is known that only highly elevated serum GAD-titers, detected also in the CSF, are autoimmune markers of GAD-SD.1 Determining the high-cutoff GAD-Ab titers connected with distinct neurologic phenotypes is clinically fundamental for diagnosis and response to therapy. The study by Muñoz-Lopetegi et al sheds light on these issues based on a retrospective chart review of 56 GAD-Ab–positive patients.
After establishing the specificity, reliability, and clinical relevance of high-cutoff ELISA titers using immunohistochemistry and cell-based assays, the authors examined the clinical phenotypes in: 36 patients with high >10,000-IU/m (median 74,700) GAD-Ab titers; 20 with low <10,000-IU/mL titers; and 61 with DM1. Overall, 34 of 36 patients with high-GAD-Ab titers had typical neurologic disorders: 7 SPS; 9 AE; 9 LE; 3 CA; and 6 overlap syndromes. In contrast, 12 of20 low–GAD-Ab titer patients had various neurological diagnoses, some autoimmune (like other encephalitides) and others non-immune (like multiple system atrophy, nonspecific ataxia, or even functional disorders). In DM1, the median GAD-Ab titer was 86 IU/mL, verifying previous studies.1 As previously reported, there was no association between GAD-Ab titer and disease severity. In 15 of 17 retrospectively reviewed patients who responded to immunotherapies (mostly IVIg), the titers decreased by >25%; in controlled studies with IVIg and rituximab, however, such a reduction was not statistically significant.
The study has several important new or verified messages for the practicing neurologists. First and most importantly, it confirms that anti–GAD65-Ab titers do matter: if high (>10,000), titers are diagnostic for a true GAD-SD, necessitating prolonged immunotherapy; in contrast, lower (<10,000) titers are associated with atypical or nonspecific neurological disorders requiring more extensive investigations, whereas very low titers are seen in DM1 or normals. Importantly, a recent study has shown that GAD-Abs are also seen within the various IVIg preparations and GAD-Abs are detected in patients receiving IVIg.2 Second, high (>10,000) titers are not arbitrary but based on cell-based assays indicating specificity, diagnostic significance, and association with measurable GAD-Ab titers in the CSF. Third, screening for GAD-Ab should be considered in clinical practice as high titers denote an immunotherapy-responsive GAD-spectrum disorder.
References