Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying temporary access to this content.
Please register today for a free account and gain full access
to all of our expert-selected content.
Already Have An Account? Log in Now
Mortality and Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery With Perioperative SARS-Cov-2 Infection
abstract
This abstract is available on the publisher's site.
Access this abstract now Full Text Available for ClinicalKey SubscribersBACKGROUND
The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection.
METHODS
This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation.
FINDINGS
This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 82·6% (219 of 265) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28-2·40], p<0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65-3·22], p<0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3-5 versus grades 1-2 (2·35 [1·57-3·53], p<0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01-2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06-2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01-2·31], p=0·047).
INTERPRETATION
Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery.
FUNDING
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research.
Additional Info
Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:
Mortality and Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery With Perioperative SARS-Cov-2 Infection: An International Cohort Study
Lancet 2020 May 29;[EPub Ahead of Print], COVIDSurg CollaborativeFrom MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
This is an extremely sobering article derived from multiple institutions and their shared experience with surgery in the COVID-positive patient. The attendant risk of pulmonary complications with, when incurred, the risk of mortality is dramatic and significant. Throughout the world, we are currently struggling with the best management of not only screening and testing for this viral pandemic but also the best management of patients within our chronic and acute care health settings. Virtually all institutions now have defined screening and testing in place both for in- and outpatients.
This dataset focused on not only positive testing but also on those individuals with associated symptoms, and, therefore, the criteria for the diagnosis of active infection. Although the surgical and procedural interventions are not explicitly delineated, it is reasonably safe to say that any procedure that impacts pulmonary function, perhaps even a deep sedation, could put symptomatic, positive patients at profound risk of pulmonary complications. This article is a critical signpost for the considerations related to surgical intervention for these patients. There are also the further implications that this experience has for the informed consent process and the preparation of patient and family for not only postoperative concerns but also virally implicated complications and even personal mortality.