Download from app store
We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.
Sign in
Join now

In an effort to better serve our users, we have streamlined our content offering. As a result, we no longer publish new content or update existing content in Urology. Visit the 'Content & Subscriptions' tab of your Settings page at any time to update your Dashboard or Newsletter Subscription preferences to continue to see news and information that interests you most.

featured
Published in Urology

Journal Scan / Research · October 23, 2018

Mechanical Failure Rates of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Components

Neurourology and Urodynamics

 

 Save  Recommend
 Share

Additional Info

Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:

Timothy Boone MD, PhD

Joshua Cohn MD, FPMRS

Neurourology and Urodynamics
Mechanical Failure Rates of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Components: Is the 3.5-cm Urethral Cuff at Higher Risk?
Neurourol Urodyn 2018 Sep 24;[EPub Ahead of Print], JC Loh-Doyle, N Hartman, A Nazemi, K Wayne, LR Doumanian, DA Ginsberg, SD Boyd

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Further Reading

Recently Updated