Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying temporary access to this content.
Please register today for a free account and gain full access
to all of our expert-selected content.
Already Have An Account? Log in Now
Sudden Cardiac Death: Pharmacotherapy and Proarrhythmic Drugs
abstract
This abstract is available on the publisher's site.
Access this abstract nowObjectives
This study sought to describe the use of pharmacotherapy in a nationwide cohort of young patients with sudden cardiac death (SCD).
Background
Several drugs have been associated with an increased risk of SCD and sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS). It remains unclear how pharmacotherapy may contribute to the overall burden of SCD in the general population.
Methods
This was a nationwide study that included all deaths that occurred between 2000 and 2009 and between 2007 and 2009 in people age 1 to 35 years and 36 to 49 years, respectively. Two physicians identified all SCDs through review of death certificates. Autopsy reports were collected. Pharmacotherapy prescribed within 90 days before SCD was identified in the Danish Registry of Medicinal Product Statistics.
Results
We identified 1,363 SCDs; median age was 38 years (interquartile range: 29 to 45 years), and 72% (n = 975) were men. Autopsy was performed in 55%. Overall, 58% of SCD cases (n = 786) received at least 1 drug within 90 days before death. The most common drugs were analgesic drugs (n = 239; 18%), antihypertensive drugs (n = 234; 17%), and antibiotic drugs (n = 218; 16%). After multivariable adjustment, prescription of “brugadogenic” drugs or >1 QT-prolonging drug was associated with an increased risk of SADS compared with explained SCD (odds ratio: 2.16 [95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 4.17] and 2.91 [95% confidence interval: 1.46 to 5.81], respectively).
Conclusions
Pharmacotherapy was identified in 58% of the SCD cases. After multivariable adjustment, there was a 2- and 3-fold increased risk of SADS compared with explained SCD in patients receiving brugadogenic drugs or >1 QT-prolonging drug, respectively. Identification of high-risk patients is warranted to lower the burden of SCD.
Connecting the Dots in Sudden Cardiac Death
The study by Risgaard, et al provides reinforcing evidence for a strong connection between sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the general population and the use of medicines known for their potential to induce arrhythmias. The fact that over 135 medications (www.CredibleMeds.org) in use today result in QT prolongation, a proven independent predictor of sudden cardiac death, has long suggested that such an association might exist. This study has demonstrated that use of these QT-prolonging drugs in a general population is associated with a threefold higher risk for SCD. Likewise, the more than 20 drugs known to induce arrhythmias in patients with Brugada syndrome (www.brugadadrugs.org) were associated with a twofold higher risk for SCD. It is remarkable that this risk, long associated with the elderly, is prominent in a relatively young population under age 50. The international trend of increasing use of prescription medicines comes with a need for greater awareness of their potential harm and the use of modern technology, such as risk factor surveillance and clinical decision–support systems, to reduce that harm.